Decision ID: 003026

In March 2005 the Supplementary Fund Assembly endorsed the proposal made by the 1992 Fund Assembly and the 1971 Fund Administrative Council that the Supplementary Fund, the 1992 Fund and the 1971 Fund should have a joint Investment Advisory Body. The Assembly decided that, in view of the fact that all Supplementary Fund Member States would also be Members of the 1992 Fund, the Supplementary Fund Assembly should not make appointments to the Investment Advisory Body but instead leave that function to the 1992 Fund Assembly. The Assembly endorsed the composition and mandate of the Investment Advisory Body.

Date: 01.03.2005
Categories: Administrative matters, Financial matters, Regulations and Rules
Subjects: Financial Regulations, Investment Advisory Bodies, establishment and appointment of members, Establishment and appointment of Members of Investment Advisory Bodies, Financial Regulations